Hi Wilfried, @8-Jul-2003, 16:21 +0200 (15:21 UK time) Wilfried Mestdagh [WM] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck:
MDP>> I previously gave you an answer that was overlooked. Looking MDP>> at your screen shot I was right. See my TBTECH posting WM> Oups, very sorry for that, but can you please repost it ? I WM> cannot find it anymore :( It's okay, you did respond to me at the time, but were "seduced" by talk of Colour Groups. ,------/ Original posting \------ | The message subject may appear to be in "bold" to you because of a | simple issue. | | If TB needs to show "foreign" characters (non 7 bit) and the default | font being used by the message list doesn't have the required | character available, then TB will select the nearest matching font | to display that message summary in the message list. Now, it may be | that the nearest matching font "looks" bold to you in comparison to | the regular message list font. `-----8<----- This is pretty much what Alexander Leschinsky was saying too. In fact, it is *Windows OS* that selects an alternative, not TB. If you change the default font in the message list to a more comprehensive font, Windows may be able to find a closer match for the high-bit characters in the header without resorting to one that looks "bold". -- Cheers -- .\\arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator TB! v1.63 Beta/11 on Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 1
________________________________________________________ http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
