Hallo Geoff, On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 12:21:52 +0100GMT (28-6-2004, 13:21 +0200, where I live), you wrote:
GL> Perhaps naively, I assumed that I could set up a sorting office GL> rule to match all and with the "Continue Processing" option GL> selected. This would run an external program (wscript //B GL> checkdate.vbs %1) which would modify the contents of the file %1 GL> to correct the datestamp. So far so good GL> My idea is that, with the datestamp corrected, my existing battery GL> of sorting office rules would shuffle the message to the correct GL> folder. Is this approach not valid (for example, because TB GL> doesn't re-import the file specified by the %1 parameter)? TB won't import the file back, just try it by running some text editor in a filter, doesn't matter whether you check or uncheck 'wait for completion' or not. The only way to import your edited file is to run a batch file as external program, make the batch file run your script first and TB second with importing command line parameters. However this will make TB decide that it's a new message and imported messages don't trigger filters. -- Groetjes, Roelof Disclaimer: Any opinion stated in this message is not necessarily shared by my budgies or rabbits. ________________________________________________________ http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
