On Sunday, July 18, 2004, at 17:08:26 [UTC-0400] (Sunday, July 18, 2004 23:08 my local time) James Senick wrote:
> With Allie's help, I've begun using PGP/Mime signatures via > macros in my templates. I like this as, IMO, it keeps the > purpose of PGP sigs without the extra visual space. However, > some of my correspondents that use OE, are complaining about > this. Predictably, they're assuming that TB is doing something > incorrectly. But perhaps I am doing something incorrectly or > maybe OE just can't handle it correctly. OE cannot recognize PGP/MIME. Please see several messages about this issue on TBBETA list: mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] or ,------ [ mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] | LS> The combination Outlook and PGP pluging is not detecting the | LS> mailbody as PGP encrypted text. This then has to be done manual by | LS> saving the PGP/MIME attachment and decrypting it with functions | LS> from the PGP tray-application. | | If I remember correctly, Outlook does not support PGP/MIME. With the | PGP plug-in it will support inlined PGP. Keeping this in mind, you | should always use inlined PGP when signing or encrypting/signing to | your Outlook contacts. | | Its probably best to handle this in Address Book templates so you | don't have to try and remember who supports PGP/MIME and who doesn't. `---------- -- Best regards, Zygmunt Wereszczynski (Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4) ________________________________________________________ http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
