Hi Thomas, On Thursday, January 28, 2021 at 7:59:11 PM you wrote:
TF> Hello Maggie, TF> On Thu, 28 Jan 2021 13:53:30 -0500 GMT (29-Jan-21, 1:53 +0700 GMT), TF> Maggie Meister wrote: JSL>>> I think I need someone to define the purpose of the cut mark because I thought JSL>>> it was to automatically eliminate everything below the cut mark (including the JSL>>> cut mark) when replying. >> This was also my understanding. I wonder if the insertion of >> another cut mark by the particular virus checker after the sig >> prevents operation of the cut mark inserted by you in your >> template from working as designed? TF> I don't know whether it's the anti-virus in their case, but TF> it may also be the ISP. In my case, GMX will cut all trailing TF> blanks. I don't know why, maybe they wwant to save bandwidth... TF> -- TF> Cheers, TF> Thomas. When I look at Stuart's message from a couple of days ago, his sig looks perfect at my end. There is no mention of an ad for whatever virus program which normally has a cut line. The same for Acheton's message. Jack's shows the derangement and there is a double cut line in his sig. However, like yours, Mike's doesn't seem to have a double cut line, but his sig is showing as broken here as well. A mystery! -- Regards, Maggie ~~~~~~~~~~~~ Running Windows 7, and emailing with The Bat! 7.0.0.56 ________________________________________________ Current version is 9.1.18 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
