Hallo Paula,
On Sunday, December 12, 1999, 9:21:50 AM (GMT+0800), Paula Ford wrote:
PF> On Saturday, December 11, 1999, Alexander V. Kiselev wrote:
>>>
>>> > 2. Implement the possibility to define new templates based on
>>> > the existing ones, please!
>>>
>>> I don't think I understand this one...
>> Wow, Paula, that was clearly a typo on my part. Actually I ment
>> "macroses".
PF> Ah, OK. Yes, that would be cool. To me, the macros are misnamed anyway.
PF> They are more 'variables' that can be used in templates. Macro usually
PF> refers to a bit of user-defined scripting, at least in all the software
PF> I've ever used. What you are asking for is more along the lines of
PF> having some scripting or macroing capability, which would indeed be
PF> nice. At a minimum, I wouldn't think it would too hard to allow users
PF> to define their own variables.
I thinnk it would be a good idea if we could define some additional
variables. (I prefer that term over "macroes" as well.) :-)
--
Cheers,
Thomas mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message reply created with The Bat! 1.38e
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998
using an Intel Celeron 366 Mhz, 128MB RAM
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------
