Hello Thomas,
Friday, January 14, 2000, 7:34:32 PM, you wrote:
TF>>> Makes sense to me: If there is .NOT.(''), meaning if there is not
TF>>> nothing i.e. anything (anything at all), the filter should catch it.
AS>> Look again: 'NOT' belongs to "Presence", so .NOT.('') means that
AS>> there is no empty strings in the mail.
AS>> So string "\n" (which separate message header from message body) is
AS>> not empty for TB!... interesting behaviour.
TF> Within the logic. "\n" is a character (actually two, CR and LF). But
TF> that is not limited to the CR/LF character pair. Most message have
TF> more than just a "\n" in them. ;-)
Sorry, but it is not correct!
Think again: Presence of empty string, but not Equality to Empty
string!!
TF>>> I think it works correctly, according to formal logic. ;-)
AS>> Are you sure? ;-)
TF> See above. If you get an absolutely empty message, without even
TF> headers, the filter wouldn't catch it. But then, how would you get it
TF> in the first place?
Who cares about such an empty message? ;-))
This thread is a next DEAD HORSE, isn't it, Mr. Moderator? ;-)))
--
Best regards,
Alex Sanyukovitch
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
19:53 14.01.2000
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------
