On Sat, 22 Jan 2000 12:19:07 +0800, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
[..snip..]
SL>> I recommend not doing it. "Techno-pritanical", to me, seems to
SL>> be used in an offensive manner. First off, don't munge the address
SL>> without a damned good reason. This is not a damned good reason.
> Didn't we go through this a couple of months ago, with the result that
> you can switch it off? "Do NOT use FROM name for REPLY-TO address"
> Account/Properties/Templates/Reply. What is the purpose of this
> renewed discussion?
Ah Thomas, why are you acting as if discussions don't resurface
because of new subscribers among other things. Anyway, Steve does make a
good point. He among others dislike seeing their names being associated
with an address that is not theirs. If *you* write a reply to Steve and
you haven't disabled the option at *your* end, guess what he'll see:
Steve Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
And yet, he has disabled the option at his end. Therefore to maintain
the piece and not offend recipients of my note, I'll not do things
inflammatory and this in my reply template:
%TO=""%TO="TBUDL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
This will allow you to keep the name association enabled but the macro
above will prevent it from taking effect with TBUDL. Yes, Thomas, that's
another reason for placing this macro in the reply template. ;-D
--
-=Allie=- | Using The Bat! v1.39
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Windows NT4.0 (Service Pack 6)
--------------------------�---------------------------------
[ <-------- The information went data way -------- ]
____
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------
