Wednesday, January 26, 2000, 4:13:38 PM, Nico wrote:
>> Except for a decent IMAP implementation...
> I didn't try IMAP yet. What's wrong with it?
TB! treats IMAP as a glorified POP3 server. IMAP is administration of
remote folders as if they are local. Completely different design.
>> ...and seamless PGP integration...
> How much more seamless do you want it? The Bat has the best PGP
> integration I ever used so far...
*cough* I have to tell it to check the key/decrypt messages. PMMail's is
seamless. A signed message comes in, when I open it the status bar on the
bottom shows whether or not the key is valid. When an encrypted message comes
in it prompts for my password and then decrypts it. In either case, I never
see the PGP header/footer, just the body of the message.
TB!'s PGP integration compared to that is really, REALLY sloppy.
> Look, I come from Pegasus. I know how a bad editor looks like. Believe
> me, this here is a good one. I feel in heaven. Anyway, how do you want
> that support? Jumping out to another program for editing?
Yes. Heaven to me is using the editor I want to (for me, vim) not what
they shovel on me. I'm not at all pleased with the reflow options nor the
complete lack complex operations in an easy-to-use manner.
>> Hmmm, all? What was that? ;)
> A surprise I guess.
I'm still waiting for a client to do it "all" correctly.
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
ICQ: 5107343 | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
-------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------
