On Sat, 29 Jan 2000 17:25:29 -0800, Nick Andriash wrote:
> A bit off topic here Allie, but your message just came in all by itself,
> and wasn't threaded to my original. I have my view options set to display
> all, sort by creation time, and view thread by subject. This combination
> has been working just fine and seems to be what others have set theirs to
> as well... there is the odd message coming through that isn't threaded
> properly, but your's usually are. So what could be different about either
> the message you just sent, or the one I sent... why all of a sudden this
> apparent change in threading?
I don't know. I had a look at the message ID's and references
in the headers and they are fine. If you thread by references they
should come together as they indeed do at my end here. However, when I
thread by subject they aren't together .... Hmmmm.
OK, hold on a minute. TB! most likely threads by subject by
stripping the Re: from the replies and matching them to the original
subject etc. Look at your original message subject:
"Red Folders As Seen on Screenshots ?"
It starts with a 'Re'! Maybe TB! stripped it of the Re and is
trying to match "d Folders As Seen on Screenshots" with the replies
which have been appropriately stripped without castrating the original
subject. AFAIK, TB! will not strip rpt'd "Re"'s right. ;)
That's my postulate as to what may have happened. Hence, I
think that it's always better to thread by references. :)
--
CU, Allie ...
Using The Bat! v1.39 ��� Windows NT4.0 (Service Pack 6)
---
** If it's stupid and works, then it ain't stupid **
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------
