Hello!
Wednesday, March 15, 2000, 7:39, Syafril Hermansyah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
SH> Hello Andrey G. Sergeev (AKA Andris),
SH> AVK>>> Actually, this might be, for example:
AVK>>> EHLO default
AGSAA>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
AGSAA>> ...And this is an incorrect (at least not recommended) behaviour.
SH> EHLO is valid syntax, this is for SMTPServer which support SMTP
SH> Extention command (see RFC-1891), whilst HELO is old fashioned :-)
:-) Of course I know that it is valid syntax. You (and probably some
other subscribers) have misunderstood me and this was my fault that
made this misunderstanding possible :-). I forgot to explain some
details about incorrect EHLO syntax - now here they are.
It's not recommended to use a fictitious hostnames such as "default"
when issuing an EHLO or HELO command. Both commands requires FQDN or, at
least, a domain name as an argument.
Again, sorry for this incovenience.
X-TheBat-Version: 1.41
X-OS: Windows 95 4.0.1111 B PE
X-System-Info: iP-III-500/128
--
Best regards, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Andrey G. Sergeev (AKA Andris) http://www.andris.msk.ru/
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------
You are subscribed as : [email protected]
