TP>> Heh and here I was thinking that 1600x1200 just didn't offer enough
TP>> screen real-estate. ;)......
S> What you need is a capable 14" monitor that can handle a change of res up to
S> 2176 x 1632 and a good pair of well fitted binoculars. That might do it ;-D
S> The space might be an illusion, but what the heck ;-)
Actually I'd love it. I used to run my 14" at 1184x884 (filled my 1M
VRAM tighter than 1152x864, did it in XFree86 on Linux where you can
set your own video card timing, but I still wonder why 1152 came into
use since 1176x884 is 4:3 and is a lot closer to 1M pixel) and just
crank the font size up. Much better in my eye; a same-screen-size font
at higher rez is going to look a lot better! Of course that does
depend on being able to maintain a high refresh rate (I suggest 72Hz
minimum).
So since I realize that I stray off topic, I end here.
love you all, ;)
-tom!
--
Hopin' this said *something* useful, [EMAIL PROTECTED] out.
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------
You are subscribed as : [email protected]
