Hi Eberhard,

On 04 May 2000 at 07:43:59 GMT +0200 (which was 06:43 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject
of "TB! WishList":

>> When it comes to MP/MDI apps off the top of my head:

>> Pegasus, Outlook Express, Eudora, Instinct, iScribe, Calypso, etc.

>> Notice that the first three are the top email clients out there.
>> Netscape

> According to what standard?

According   to   various  online  and  media  polls  and  installation
statistics. He said "top", not "best".

> Certainly not mine. But I will giove you that: I will check out
> iScribe and Instinct. Calypso sucks as well as the "top three".

Steve's not saying they are good email clients - merely popular.

>>     So, with that said, coming to one of the few /real/ alternatives
>> to the host of clients that offer single-account, multi-pop and
>> asking for just that feature is going to get you a /LOT/ of
>> resistance, especially by people who need that feature. Quite
>> frankly, since there are quite a few popular clients out there that
>> implement it, use them. You have 5 good ones to pick from, have
>> fun. Ask /them/ to implement features, not ruin one of the few
>> alternatives.

> Oh dear. If I would have known that _asking_ for sth would endanger
> your peace of mind I might have restrained myself in the first
> place. I've just decided that this _is_ a bad joke and that you must
> be sitting in front of your screen having a good laugh all over.
> Congrats.

What  Steve  is  saying  is  that  TB  offers  a different approach to
managing  multiple  accounts  compared  to  more  popular email client
software  out  there.  He  is  stating  his opinion (which I happen to
share)  that  to  encompass  the suggestion you made about downloading
multiple   POP3  sources  to  a  single  account  would  compromise  a
fundamental  uniqueness  in  The  Bat!  which can only be found in one
other email client.

While  his wording may be "harsh", I understand the point he is making
-  that  there  is  a  wide  choice  of email software that doesn't do
multiPOP  the  TB  way  and  perhaps,  if you feel the methodology you
outlined  to  be  vital  to your email requirements, then you may have
made the wrong decision in choosing TB as your client of preference.

You have both made your arguments very convincingly but I also believe
that  all  points to be made *have* been made. It may be that Stef and
Max,  if they have followed this debate, can think of a way of keeping
the  current  multiPOP  method  but  introduce ways for any account to
trawl multiPOP sources /as well/.

Now:  please  can  we  stop  this  discussion before it turns personal
(which  I  believe  it  is in danger of doing). So, this now becomes a
moderator's  "DEAD  HORSE"  pronouncement and, if you feel the need to
say  more, please take it off-list (include me in the CC - I'd like to
debate it further if necessary).

-- 
Cheers,
.\\arck

Marck D. Pearlstone, Consultant Software Engineer
Moderator TBUDL / TBBETA
www: http://www.silverstones.com
PGP key: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Body=GET%20MARCKKEY>

*-----------------------------------------------
| Using The Bat! 1.42 Beta/21 S/N 14F4B4B2
| under Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998  
*-----------------------------------------------

-- 
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------

You are subscribed as : [email protected]


Reply via email to