Hello Jack, On Sat, 31 Aug 2019 16:57:26 -0500 GMT (01-Sep-19, 4:57 +0700 GMT), Jack S. LaRosa wrote:
> Hello Thomas, > On Friday, August 30, 2019 you wrote: TF>> Hello MFPA, TF>> On Sat, 31 Aug 2019 02:24:29 +0100 GMT (31-Aug-19, 8:24 +0700 GMT), TF>> MFPA wrote: >>>> I also notice %THEBATVERSION macro fails to return >>>> the "(64-bit)" >>>> suffix. I just reported this at >>>> https://bt.ritlabs.com/view.php?id=1809. >>> It seems this was already addressed. There is now >>> %THEBATVERSION(WITHBITS) and several other variants. See Max's reply >>> to https://bt.ritlabs.com/view.php?id=1809. TF>> It works! Wow. TF>> -- TF>> Cheers, TF>> Thomas. TF>> Message reply created with The Bat! Version 8.8.9 (64-bit) TF>> under Windows 10.0 Build 18362 > Interestingly (and unfortunately), some do and some don't. I have a .png here: > https://www.dropbox.com/s/534amc5masob0kk/TBsig.png?dl=0 > which shows how the bottom of my sig is configured. It can be compared to the > sig in this reply. I thought it was working when I replied to MFPA on the 29th > but apparently not now. The template in use (and confirmed) is in the folder > properties of my TBDL folder. > I hope it's acceptable to include a Dropbox link to a picture 'cause if it > isn't, I've long since forgotten how else to do it or even if it can be done. > TIA [sig was automitically cut; reinserting:] > The Bat! E-Mail Client by Ritlabs version 6.0.12 Maybe the macro doesn't work with v6.x. -- Cheers, Thomas. Message reply created with The Bat! Version 8.8.9 (64-bit) under Windows 10.0 Build 18362 ________________________________________________ Current version is 8.0.18 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
