On Mon, 31 Jul 2000 10:40:38 -0500, Katsmeow wrote:
K> Oh.... as a new user of a few weeks standing I have been using Parked
K> to mean kept and moving the parked messages. I had no idea...until
K> now..that they lost their parked status on moving. What a PITA. It
K> would seem fairly obvious to me that in a program with so many
K> filtering capabilities and such that people would have multiple
K> folder and might well want to move Parked messages without having to
K> go into the new folder and Park them again. I think this is a
K> significant flaw.
My issue is with the practicality of the feature rather than how
it's implemented. It's implemented in a logical fashion considering what
the developers have designated 'parking' as meaning. If you park a
message, you have rendered it *both* non-deletable or unmovable. If you
chose to move a parked message, then you have unparked it by your
action, since by definition parked messages cannot be moved. ;-) I
therefore don't see how one complain that their 'parked' messages that
have been moved are no longer parked.
As with all else who have contributed to this thread, I very
much would prefer a 'keep' feature which I personally find more
applicable to more situations. Most often, I simply wish to make a
message undeletable but am not too concerned about not moving it, unless
read or replied filters would normally move the message if not parked.
--
-=A.C. Martin=- [ TB! v1.45 S/MIME | Win2k Pro ]
PGP Key: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=SendAlliePGPKey
________________________________________________________
"STUPIDITY is NOT a HANDICAP! Park elsewhere! "
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------
You are subscribed as : [email protected]
