-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hello Curtis,
Monday, August 07, 2000, 11:13:59 PM, you wrote:
SL>> If there are any other PMMail people on here I'm sure they would
SL>> back me up in saying that the interface for PMMail was much more
SL>> slick and polished than TB!'s is. I'd love to see RITLABS take
one
SL>> release and do nothing but polish up the interface.
C> I agree here. I used PMMail for some time though not the PGP
enabled
C> version. The interface is very similar to TB!'s but more
polished.
C> The status line in it's main window does a lot for it.
I'm not a PMMail user but I agree that the interface needs
polishing.
Others I've shown The Bat! to are put off by the interface
(especially the need to use fonts on a users own computer).
However, I disagree about PGP implementation: it seems to me that
PGP messages should be seen to be the same in all e-mail clients,
as
though the client was invisible to the process.
Graham mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 6.5i
iQA/AwUBOZA+WejDdKubEspHEQK4oQCZAbuAMq3wgCzdA8SJe6d61hfdp+sAnj38
qF1kCgJQkbr7lbcfoF4Xpyhk
=GlSC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------
You are subscribed as : [email protected]
