TF> If you mean that the incoming message was not quoted when you hit
TF> reply, those messages probably came in as HTML but not alternative.
TF> Check the headers fgor content-type.
TF> I said it before and I'll say it again: For those messages, TB fakes a
TF> plain-text message when you set HTML auto-view "off" but refuses to
TF> use this same method for replying, and that is annoying. Greatly
TF> annoying, and it makes TB unusable for people like my mother. How
TF> would I epxlain headers to her? She just wants to reply to an incoming
TF> message!
TF> Does anybody agree with me?
Yes. To me this is another 'bit' which the bat falls short. It is
all well and good to tilt at windmills and chant 'no html .. no html'
BUT it is there. Plain and simple. It is not going away so how can
BAT make working with it easier. It does a good job at making a text
version. SO why not pass that on to the reply?
--
DSig
David Tod Sigafoos
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------
You are subscribed as : [email protected]
