Hello Karin,
On Fri, 5 Jan 2001 at 02:54:21 GMT +0100 (which was 5:54 PM
where I live) witnesses say Karin Spaink typed:
> I'm actually afraid that TB might try to give User A address
> book B (and then fail to find it, because it's in User B's
> private directory). I haven't tried this, I must admit.
TB used to store this in the registry, so there should *not* be any
problem. However, the recent move to store less in the registry, I am
not sure how this would be handled.
This is just an interesting question, I would be stretching to make
use of the answer. I was curious if anyone had already explored that
aspect.
> I tried what would happen if User A (on computer A) the
> has the general address book open, while user B (on a
> networked computer B, using the same copy of TB) opens the
> address book too and adds and entry. User A won't see that
> new address and can make his own changes. However, when he
> restarts TB, he *will* see the changes made by User B, while
> his own mutations are there too. Quite nifty.
That is very interesting. Thanks for all your input.
--
Thanks for writing,
Januk Aggarwal
Using The Bat! 1.48f
under Windows 98 4.10 Build 2222 A
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------
You are subscribed as : [email protected]
