Hey Thomas,
Friday, January 05, 2001, 1:13:13 AM, you wrote:
AGSAA>> The correct behaviour is to ignore the NumPad status.
TF> Is that so? I have never heard this. I think if you want to inoput
TF> ASCII codes via AtlNumPad, you have to make sure the NumLock light is
TF> on. It has always been this way, and wouldn't understand why
TF> alt+<uparrow> on the NumPad should have the same meaning as alt-8 on
TF> the NumPad.
I don't know why, but my different PC's / OS's seem to ignore the
NumLock key when combining with the Alt key for ASCII chars.
Alt+116 = t regardless of the NumLock status for
Win2k/NT/98/95/m$-dos6/5/3/dr-dos7 on ThinkPad/Dell workstation, and
Compaq servers.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Bat! v1.48f
Windows NT 5.0.2195 (Service Pack 1)
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------
You are subscribed as : [email protected]
