Hello Nick,
On Sat, 13 Jan 2001, 13:20:20 h [GMT -0800] (which
was 22:20 h [GMT +0100] where I live) you wrote:
KJ>> Yes, you do. This is (most time as I get it) unnecessary, but a
KJ>> precaution if an address should be already in the To: field.
NA> Ah, then that makes sense in that case. In Tim's case, putting %To"" would
NA> be redundant then if I understand the concept correctly, because he already
NA> had the right address in the To: section of his headers.
Yeah, but as someone said earlier folder level templates are crap. Ok,
he doesn't exactly said that, but they are to be honest.
Sometimes this messes everything up. It's better to use the
%TO""%TO... macro just in case.
--
Best regards,
Kari Jakobi
The Bat! 1.49c on Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 SP1
To obtain my PGP-Key send a message to:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=PGP-KEY_REQUEST
PGP-KEY ID: 0x388CEBFF
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------
You are subscribed as : [email protected]
