-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi David,
On 20 January 2001 at 17:11:44 +0100 (which was 16:11 where I live)
David Buntenbroich wrote and made these points:
DB> AFAIK in e-mail programs it is recommended by RFCs and part of the
DB> netiquette that hard returns are added by the e-mail programs at
DB> about 70 characters a line. This is e.g. helpful for quoting.
It is. Furthermore, many of them wrap after you hit send, so it's
entirely out of your control and sight. The suggestion of attaching an
externally prepared file is completely correct. Email was not designed
to convey DTP information. DTP information was not designed to be sent
as email messages. It's exactly what attachments are meant for.
DB> Texts which you want to process further after mailing should be
DB> sent as an attachment.
I agree with you completely.
- --
Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- Moderator TBUDL / TBBETA / TBTECH
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
[ PGP Key ID: 0x929DCDA0 | www: http://www.silverstones.com ]
[ Any opinions are my own and not those of RIT labs ]
TB! v1.49c S/N 14F4B4B2 on Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 1
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 6.5.8 Secured
Comment: PGP Sealed for freshness
iQA/AwUBOmnMEjnkJKuSnc2gEQKsAwCdHu6D1/W6xRt+/AQ1w1XjHaD1m/8AoLKQ
gn9HkxTt2jJ/3q0siPxBGOU6
=5+T2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
______________________________________________________
Archives : <http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com>
Moderators : <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
TBTech List: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
You are subscribed as : [email protected]
