-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi Andrew,
On 30 January 2001 at 11:34:44 -0000 (which was 11:34 where I live)
Andrew Hodgson wrote and made these points:
AH> Mulberry is the comparison :-)
AH> I hate the ui, however, the degree to which it supports imap is cool.
It has to be said that Mulberry is probably the paragon amongst IMAP
clients.
I all fairness, the very ethos of full IMAP, with on-line folder
structures, goes against the TB strengths in local mail-base. I can't
see how TB can offer full IMAP support and still be the TB we all
"know and love" with extreme filter, RegEx support and archive
searching capabilities. This is probably the reason TB only offers it
as a glorified POP3.
- --
Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- Moderator TBUDL / TBBETA / TBTECH
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
[ PGP Key ID: 0x929DCDA0 | www: http://www.silverstones.com ]
[ Any opinions are my own and not those of RIT labs ]
TB! v1.49c S/N 14F4B4B2 on Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 1
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 6.5.8 Secured
Comment: PGP Sealed for freshness
iQA/AwUBOnb64TnkJKuSnc2gEQLcqQCeJtmTh4Pf1HaMdcshadlnXbxibxcAnRrZ
cBMK+L8SBnJ3DkDX3VB9gYL7
=NjuW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
______________________________________________________
Archives : <http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com>
Moderators : <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
TBTech List: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
You are subscribed as : [email protected]
