(I'm resending this reply for it has travelled for more than 16
hours without getting to the list. I guess it disappeared in the
ether. If it did get through eventually, there would be a dupe, and
I apologize for that.)


On Wednesday, January 31, 2001, 9:03:32 AM, Jan wrote:

Ming-Li>> I usually prefer unix mbox format over text (of which the
Ming-Li>> format depends on the template of choice), however, for it
Ming-Li>> keeps all the headers and the original received time,
Ming-Li>> making it possible to re-import back into TB when
Ming-Li>> necessary.

>  Thanks, Ming Li. What does the function "export kludges" do then?
>  Does this keep the kludges (headers) with each msg in text form?

Sorry for getting back to you so late. No time for email lately.

Yes, I believe the "Export kludges" option would export the headers
as well (never tried it, though). The difference lies in the format
of the text file. Even if you keep everything, TB couldn't import it
back if it's not in a certain format. That's why I prefer the unix
mbox format.

>  My thought was if I was importing the unix formatted file would I not
>  have to import all of it vs selecting the text of the msg I might
>  need a special reply for in the text formatted file? I know this is
>  not very clear so I hope you can understand what I'm asking?

If you want to import only part of a unix mbox file, just use an
editor to cut out the part you want, save it as another file, and
import it. As long as it's in the right format (starting a message
with a "From" line, followed by headers, a blank line, and the
message body), it should be imported fine.

-- 
Best regards,
Ming-Li

The Bat! 1.49c | Win2k SP1



-- 
______________________________________________________
Archives   : <http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com>
Moderators : <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
TBTech List: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to