Hello Thomas,
On Sunday, June 03, 2001 at 7:08:20 PM you wrote:
T> Hello Peter,
T> On Sun, 3 Jun 2001 18:56:36 +0200 GMT (04/06/2001, 00:56 +0800 GMT),
T> Peter Palmreuther wrote:
LG>>> You could also filter on '@' in the headers (kludges), that will
LG>>> also catch all messages.
PP>> NOPE :-( ... sometimes I get message neither with any '@' in To, CC, nor in
PP>> From ... If you wish, I could send a message to you not containing any
PP>> informations in any "visible" header-fields :-)
T> I have never received any such message. And if either one of the
T> headers was missing, it has always been spam.
T> Then, a legitimate message will have a Message-ID, which will contain
T> the @ character.
T> Do you receive legitimate email without any of those headers?
Of course not!!!
I was just replying to Lars's comment to filter on '@' to catch ALL messages
... AFAIR the discussion was about a filter that catches every message ... and
there is the theoretical possibility to receive a message without an '@' in
the headers users normally know about ... :-)
OK .. there's a "Delivered To" line I've in all my e-mails but I think this is
mailer-daemon specific :-)
The discussed point even was not to legitimate an email by having a '@' in it,
but to filter the legetimate and move the rest to trash ... but how to catch
"the rest" ... and that was the 'filter on "@"' situation I wasn't able to
shut up silently, but trying to impress with all my knowledge *GGG*
--
Regards
Peter Palmreuther mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using The Bat! v1.53 Beta/11 on Windows 98 4.90 Build 3000 (WindowsME)
--
______________________________________________________
Archives : <http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com>
Moderators : <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
TBTech List: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
You are subscribed as : [email protected]
