Hello!
As an answer for Your letter, I would like to write:
>> If not, are there any plans to support Arabic, Chinese, Japanese...?
> So my posting a minute ago to tamuz. BTW, there are no "complicated"
> languages in computing, but single-byte character languages (most of
> them) and double-byte character sets (DBCS; also called CJK -
> Chinese-Japanese-Korean).
I know that, but try to implement double-byte character sets (now I know
its name! 8) in msvc without mfc...
> TB displays Chinese just fine except that it does not insert automatic
> line breaks in autowrap or auto-format;
Should we consider this to be a bug?
> Arabic is not complicated. In fact, the writing is much easier and
> more logical than English. What makes you think it is complicated?
Ok, You're right, but it's right-to-left. Is it supported by TB!?
> Kanji is not an alphabet. The Chinese use characters (depicting
> meaning), not letters (depicting pronunciation), that's why it is not
> an alphabet.
You are right and I know that (I even tried to learn Kanji once). But
it's easier for me to treat Kanji as an alphabet, because I don't know
proper english word for this... hmm... 'Chinese-bugs-on-paper?'.
> Kanji is just the Japanese word for "Chinese characters", one of the
> three sets of characters they use (four sets, if you count Romanji).
So it should be called character set? Ok, good to know.
Anyway - thanks!
Best Regards
IronHand
--
,------[ IronHand of CruX ]------- GCS d- s:- a19 C+++ UL++++ P+++ -.
| MAIL:[EMAIL PROTECTED] L+++@ E- W+++ N+ o? K w+++ !O M |
| WWW: +none yet+ ICQ:43598300 V- PS+ PE- Y PGP- t+ 5+ X-- R++ |
`--------------------------------- tv- b+ !DI D+ G++ e h!>h++ r y? -'
--
______________________________________________________
Archives : <http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com>
Moderators : <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
TBTech List: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
You are subscribed as : [email protected]
