Hello Leif,
On Thu, 13 Sep 2001 at 15:51:27 [GMT -0400], you wrote:
LG> I noticed that Peter Palmreuther's message (Message-ID:
LG> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) displayed a
LG> valid signature. He wasn't using PGP, so I'm trying this without
LG> PGP.
Hmmm, I actually checked two of Peter's messages. The one mentioned
above which showed a good sig, and (Message-ID:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) which shows a bad
sig.
I compared the two's headers, and the only difference between the two
(that should make a difference anyways) was the line:
For good sig:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
For bad sig:
Content-Type: text/plain
That's the only difference. My messages with the bad sig are also
missing the charset=us-ascii as well.
Peter, what language did you have your's set to when you sent the good
message? I just set this one to Latin ISO-8859-1. We'll see what
happens.
Cheers,
Leif Gregory
--
List Moderator (and fellow registered end-user)
PCWize Editor / ICQ 216395 / PGP Key ID 0x7CD4926F
Web Site <http://www.PCWize.com>
TB FAQ <http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/FAQ.html>
Using The Bat! 1.54 Beta/8 under Windows 98 4.10 Build 2222 A
on a Pentium III 500 MHz notebook with 256MB.
Tagline of the day:
Just remember...if the world didn't suck, we'd all fall off.
S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
