Hi All,

On Fri, 14 Sep 2001 at 14:56:19 GMT +0200 (9/14/2001 7:56 PM GMT +0700
where you think I live) "Edvinas"=[E] typed the following :

SH>> To prevent MUA confusing :-).

E> Excuse my ignorance - what is MUA? :)

Mail User Agent = Mailer.

SH>> If  the  header said it is QP while infact the body is plain-text, the
SH>> result is unpredictable :-)

E> Yes, I understand that. But information about message encoding type
E> is kept in "Content-Transfer-Encoding" header field. "Content-Type"
E> has nothing to do with it.

E> You  may  wonder  why it is so important for me :) Thing is that my
E> native  language  charset  ir  ISO-8859-13  and  The  Bat! displays
E> message  in  this  encoding  if charset is not specified in message
E> header  (this list removes such information!). When someone in this
E> list  uses  characters  from  other  charsets  I  can't see correct
E> characters.  I  need manually to choose correct charset. I hope you
E> understand what I am trying to tell.

I  can  understand  that,  but perhaps you may reconsider the names of
"humanize  QP",  it  means  the  listserver  trying  to *convert* (not
*stripe out*) QP to PT, to make even "dumb" MUA to understand, easy to
decode.

Look  last  posting from Ottar, are your TB! having problem to display
it ?

Most  person  only  seen what's the content/body text, only if our MUA
have problem to decode or for other reason, we need to look the header
for further analysis :-)
Seems  to  me  you're  Techie person, why not join to tbtech list as I
suggest, make test there and compare it :-)

-- 
Best regards,

- Syafril -               mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Flying with The Bat! 1.54 Beta/8
under Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2



-- 
________________________________________________________
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d

Reply via email to