Hello Dierk, On Sunday, 25. November 2001 at 10:07:06 you wrote (at least in part):
DH> But I think DH> that there is a very good reason behind leaving all RFC headers in a DH> forwarded message, don't you? No I don't. I don't know why somebody should be interested in full RFC-headers as macro '%HEADERS' outputs them. I first wanted to get rid of that _full_ header quoting as requested, the second step is to implement useful macros like '%SUBJECT', '%OFROM', etc ... Full RFC-headers contain also 'Received-Lines' & more that nobody else is interested in. If I want to forward a message 'like is' I could use the 'MIME-forward' option :-) -- Regards Peter Palmreuther mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (The Bat! v1.54/10e on Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 1) A lie in time saves nine. -- ________________________________________________________ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d FAQ : http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
