Hello Marc, hi list,
 
On Friday, December 07, 2001 'Marc van Breemen' wrote:

> Can I rely on RitLabs that they introduce The Bat version 2 in the
> very near future?

I don't belive it will be finished within the next three or four
months. but really nobody knows that exactly. Probably even ritlabs
doesn't know.

> They are building it for more than two years
> now. Still no beta to see, that is not really promising. 
[...]
> Can anybody explain me why RitLabs introduces new features (like common
> folders) in an 'old' version (version 1.xx) when they are very (I hope) busy
> with finishing (I hope) version 2.....? If I were them I put all my
> effort in completing version 2 and, besides solving the serious bugs,
> quit developing version 1. Why not? Tell me, why not?

Why is everyone so focused to the version 2? If a program works well
and solves all my problems it can be a version 0.1, version 0.9 or
10,000. And if I don't like a program and they call it version "2000
XL", it won't become better!
So be happy about a great mail-client in version 1.xx!


-- 
Greetings,
Nils

Using The Bat! 1.53t on Windows 98 4.90 Build 3000

<   Sorry if my English is not that well. But it is not my    >
<  first language. Hope you understand what I wanted to say.  >


-- 
________________________________________________________
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ        : http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 

Reply via email to