Hello R�mi! On 29 Dec 2001 at 16:53:46 you wrote:
> The editor in TB is rather disatrous in many respects, but what some > people, including myself, consider as poor design is generally seen as > brillant by the members of this list, particularly those who like to > design pretty little tables and indulge in useless ASCII art. Go > figure... Please, we had that. For short: If a feature I have to use a lot is "disastrous" I don't bore others with it, but gon on to another programme. To dwell on my personal history, I started out with AOL, then got around to Eudora light, Eudora, Free Agent (no usable e-mail function) and ended up with TB!. I had to use OE two or three times on the job. I also know Netscape's e-mail client. All in all TB! (especially its editor, although I don't use much tables/ASCII art) still comes out a winner. BTW, what I'd really like is another tone in our discussion. One can discuss much better - particularly with e-mail - when we don't use so much polemics and implications of "others are stupid" like you do. We did have this topic some weeks back. And I assure you that I am of the more generous kind, but this is the third time you fling something in the face of other users that is not to be seen in such a place. -- Dierk Haasis http://www.Write4U.de http://Interest.Write4U.de/pongo PGP keys available: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=SendMyPGPkeys The Bat 1.54 Beta/20 on Windows 95 4.0 67306684 C Lover's happiness: As long as I have you, I can endure all the troubles you inevitably bring. (Ashleigh Brilliant/Derek Leveret) -- ________________________________________________________ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d FAQ : http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
