Hello Elwin. At 12:00 PM on Tuesday, January 15, 2002 you wrote the following about [Auto Responding to SpamCop]
>> As for purely html msgs, there was a discussion a >> while back, the bottom line of which, was that TB! >> %HEADERS doesn't include what someone labeled the >> 'lower' headers that includes html info. Elwin> I'm unsure what those 'lower' headers would be? Elwin> It seems to me like the only thing necessary is Elwin> that the message source (as given by F9) should Elwin> be passed instead of the plaintext... I did a side by side comparison on the F9 content & the msg generated by my template. They were identical unless you know something I don't, a possibility I'm definitely happy to entertain. The 'lower' header subject came up when I was trying to filter for a series of virus msgs which contained only html w/o text. TB! was un-able to filter for this because, according to those who are a lot smarter than I am, it did not look thru all the header info. The so called 'lower header' info addressed the html content. Meantime, SpamCop seems to be finding sufficient info from my msgs to process the egregious examples of Spam that I send them. Could what I do be improved upon; undoubtedly, but I don't know how. If you do (or anyone else does), I'm all ears. TIA -- Jan Rifkinson Ridgefield, CT USA TB! V1.54 Beta/28/W2K_SP2/PGP Key ID: 0x3F14A060 -- ________________________________________________________ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d FAQ : http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
