-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi Stefan,
On 05 March 2002 at 08:02:32 -0600 (which was 14:02 where I live) Stefan Zauchenberger wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > .. Is there a reason for this? It seems that the program is > generally so comprehensive. Why would this feature be overlooked? Because IMAP is a fully online mail handling protocol. TB is a fully off-line mail handling client. They come from opposite ends of the same pond and the writers have had a conceptual problem in making a bridge. > Does anyone know if IMAP folders will be fully-supported in 1.54? Is > there a BETA of this out there yet? I don't know what the timescales for IMAP support are. I do know that there is no improvement in IMAP in the current beta versions. - -- Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- List moderator ___________________________________________________________________ \ BrainStorm - brain amplifier - at: http://www.brainstormsw.com / \ PGP Key ID: 0x929DCDA0 | www: http://www.silverstones.com / � SB! v1.54 Beta/43/iKey1000-5523848F0B1 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2 � -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (MingW32) iD8DBQE8hQ6MOeQkq5KdzaARArhnAJwOz9QDY31njRgXnu8hCVALrFXy1wCcDD7i XANvvxzYsbMKFPtdt3NlZnk= =h+oy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- ________________________________________________________ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d FAQ : http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
