I've thought of using the config that Nick does, just protecting
against copying, etc., without the POP3 scan, but I've kept my mail,
even with TB!, going through NOD's POP3 scanner. It's ultra quick
(except in the case of some large HTML mail with web links, which go
slow), and it's kept a few nasties off my system.
JN
Nick Andriash wrote on Thursday, March 07, 2002:
> Hello Kai G�ing,
> On Thursday, March 07 2002 at 06:59 AM PDT, you wrote:
>> I was wondering if anybody on this list has tried out NOD32 (www.nod32.com),
>> especially in conjunction with TB?
> Yes, I have run NOD32 with it's POP3 Mail Scanner using TB and had no
> problems whatsoever. I feel NOD32 to be one of the very best scanners
> around, and most certainly the fastest. However, with TB's inherent
> safety I didn't find the need for the E-Mail Scanner, but I run AMON
> (equivalent to NAV's Auto-Protect) constantly... and without the huge
> overhead experienced using NAV.
--
________________________________________________________
Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ : http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
