-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi Clif,
@02 April 2002, 01:12:25 -0800 (10:12 UK time) Clif Oliver wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > does this indicate that RitLabs doesn't care what the user want? Let me put this a little more clearly than the simple "No" you have had back from most respondents. RITlabs certainly *do* care and the list of new features in the 1.60 release substantiates that as a fact. Ever heard that "Can't please all of the people.." saying? Implementation of suggestions may be delayed by being a) not possible in the current design and code structure b) not desirable from a marketing POV c) waiting for the TB V2 project... and numerous other reasons, none of which amount to "RITlabs don't care". They do care... dare I say, with a passion? - -- Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- List moderator SB! v1.60d/iKey1000-5523848F0B1 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2 · -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6-2 (MingW32) iD8DBQE8qYfvOeQkq5KdzaARAnlMAKCEFBpkchfOeVIbHI57jWYEGP57HACgxAYp gHOHGrUafRGhMqU/4dJT9BI= =jQ2J -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ________________________________________________________ Current Ver: 1.60c FAQ : http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
