Hello Allie,

Sunday, April 7, 2002, 1:00:29 PM, you wrote:

ACM> I've tried VA and I can sympathise with its former users. VA has quite
ACM> an unusual/different approach to design and how things are done. I
ACM> tried it especially for Newsgroups, but its methods were so different
ACM> that I couldn't make the change, especially since I wasn't convinced
ACM> that it provided a better solution for my needs than Agent or X-News
ACM> did.

IMHO VA was NOT the best at everything. It was the fact that ONLY 1 user
interface was needed for CIS forums, e-mail, & newsgroups. It not only
covered ALL the bases, but did so in ONLY 1 pass over multiple news
servers, e-mail accounts, and CIS. The fact you could use 1 program to do
ALL pretty good was what endured me to VA.

ACM> I guess the reverse would also apply in that migrating from VA to TB!
ACM> could be an awkward ride at first. But there are features in TB! that
ACM> can make you feel at home. It's just a different approach to get
ACM> accustomed to.

Interesting ride is more like it. What it did was force me to look at
other programs which expanded my experience. The most interesting part is
reading how loyal users defend the program of their choice. The learning
curve is NOT an easy hill to climb especially when you are trying to be
productive. In most instances their defense is rooted in the fact that
they've used it for so long, and feel comfortable with it. If they would
open their mind to achieving the same goal a different way, then the
learning would probably be easier.



-- 
Best regards,
 Greg                            mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


________________________________________________________
Current Ver: 1.60c
FAQ        : http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to