Hello Luc, 15 Apr 2002, 12:36:41, you wrote:
> Good afternoon Roelof, > It was foretold that on 15-4-2002 @ 11:49:43 GMT+0200 (which was > 11:49:43 where I live) Roelof Otten wrote and spread these wise > comments on "Additional headers?": > <snipped a bit> RO>> Look into my headers, I've done it this way. RO>> Just below the From-header. > Just curious: what's the difference between having it as X:........ > and Comment:...... > The result is the same: add additional info to the headers. Or am i > mistaken? According to the service I'm trying to communicate with, I can specify the information about my reference ID in two ways, either in the body of the message or in the headers. Now, adding it in the body causes some kind of problem with the automated software that read my mails so it returns a failure despite it actually accepts and responds to the commands and updates therein. I therefore wanted to try the put-it-in-the-headers option in order to avoid this pseudo-failure which wreaks havoc with the software in my end that needs to acknowledge the successful change, which it doesn't because of the (incorrect) failure report. I will try to see if the %COMMENT thing works despite the odd formatting of the header. I doubt it though. Yours, Per G�tterup -- Per G�tterup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> � PGP: 0xBAD47FA5 � ICQ: 9042837 Systems Administrator NetGroup A/S � Store Kongensgade 40H � DK-1264 Copenhagen K � Denmark Phone: +45 33130055 � Fax: +45 33130066 � Web: www.netgroup.dk Technical Account Manager N|G|D|C NetGroup Data Center � Sydvestvej 100 � DK-2600 Glostrup � Denmark Phone: +45 70274555 (24/7) � Web: www.ngdc.net / www.ngdc.dk "If we can't fix it -- we'll fix it so nobody can." ________________________________________________________ Current Ver: 1.60c FAQ : http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
