Hello Assad, On Tue, 16 Apr 2002 19:57:42 +0400GMT (16-4-02, 17:57 +0200GMT, where I live), you wrote:
RO>> That's not that surprising. The macro is triggered by the first RO>> address in the To: header and a comma is a valid separation sign for AT> I don't know if you got me correctly, but here is the scenario. AT> I received an email in the following format this morning: AT> "ABC Co.,Shanghai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" And the macro reads this as two addresses "ABC Co." and "Shanghai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" AT> I have the name of the contact person for ABC Co. in my address AT> book. When I press reply, this macro %ABToFirstName="%TOFNAME" AT> should give me the first name of that person as entered in my AT> address book, but it does not. No, because the macro tries to match "ABC Co." in your address book and it isn't there. (Because it isn't a valid address.) AT> When I edit the original message and remove the comma, the AT> template picks up the first name correctly. So I suppose it is a AT> bug. It surely is undesired behaviour. But most of all by ABC, they ought to use a from address as: "ABC Co., Shanghai" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I suppose TB could be patched to make TB translate the address correctly, but ...... -- Groetjes, Roelof ________________________________________________________ Current Ver: 1.60c FAQ : http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
