-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi Ian,
@16 April 2002, 23:51:42 +0200 (22:51 UK time) Ian Petersen wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Alternatively, you could stop inflicting the list with unnecessary > PGP signatures. Such things are not needed on an informal, public > discussion list. Excuse me? "Inflicting"? 1) I'm the moderator here. When I make a statement it needs to be verifiably from me. I have always used PGP to provide such assurance. While my postings may not always be "formal", some are and as such *all* of my posts *must* be signed since any *one* that is not may be deemed to be a forgery. 2) PGP signing is welcomed and not discouraged on this list since it is a function of TB and some users need help with its use (although there are specialised lists such as PGP-Basics which are possibly more appropriate venues). - -- Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- List moderator SB! v1.60d/iKey1000-5523848F0B1 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2 � -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQE8vKNDOeQkq5KdzaARArjrAJ9oyuHQNFzprRdnSmoCcvvw7+k24ACfVZ1k 6MqEBQKgwT0ELHoaRPbwHzc= =vNTX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ________________________________________________________ Current Ver: 1.60c FAQ : http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
