Thanks to everyone for your feedback. It's been very helpful.

I'm actually shying away from having a mail server on the server.
Everything that they do is POP3 based and they don't have the typical
corporate mentality regarding e-mail. I'm thinking that simpler is
better, having been the Exchange route with them already.

Prior to saying we could do this, I had spoken with the person that
had first turned me on to TB and his firm is setup in the same manner.
With the mailboxes stored on the server, then more than one person can
access the mailbox at a time and everything is backed up nightly - to
me it sounds like an ideal setup for this client.

Unless someone thinks this is foolish. :)


Michael T. Ashby
Consultant
The Ashby Group
http://www.ashbygroup.net
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


====================
Thursday, April 18, 2002, 12:39:45 PM, you wrote:

PP> Hello Miguel,

PP> On Thursday, April 18, 2002 at 3:34:34 PM you wrote in
PP> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (at least in part):

>>> I'm familiar with Pegasus, but I really like TB and would like to use
>>> it as part of the solutions. Thank you for the suggestion though.

MAU>> You don't need Pegasus. You can have a very nice setup with Mercury/32
MAU>> as a server (it's free, BTW) and The Bat! as e-mail clients. This is
MAU>> what I use.

PP> And this is what I'd suggest too ... not Mercury in any case, I don't know
PP> this software so I can't recommend it, but a 'real' Mail-Server plus TB!.
PP> Server capabilities of TB! are limited in some matters so I wouldn't rely
PP> on them, but there're cheaper and better SMTP/POP3-servers out there than
PP> MS-Exchange :-)

PP> Mercury (as we've read), MDaemon, ArGoSoft ... and for sure several other
PP> Windows Mail-Servers.

PP> I've just entered

PP> Windows Mail-Server

PP> into Google and had more than enough hit.
PP> Tucows is another idea ... maybe you want start here

PP> http://thenewsmonsters.tucows.com/mailserver95.html

PP> having a look if there's something that fits your needs.
PP> TB! should be work with every SMTP & POP3 enabled server software, so this
PP> will not matter.

PP> P.S.: I assume a fast and stable Linux box is out of discussion for server?
PP> *GGG*


________________________________________________________
Current Ver: 1.60c
FAQ        : http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to