My small collection of downloaded TB! files, held on hand in case I need to reinstall, now includes the following:
153t 3,844 Kb 160c 4,659 Kb 160h 2,473 Kb It seems that I should be able to discard the 160c file in favor of the 160h file, but I am hesitant because of the difference in file sizes. The 160h file is the installation file on the RITlabs web site as of today; it appears to be the complete program, not simply the program executable. The 160c file was, I think, the same type of offering on the same web site. 1. Why are they so different in size? 2. Any reason to retain the 160c file? (or the 153t file?) -- JN ________________________________________________________ Current Ver: 1.60c FAQ : http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]