-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi Michael,

@10 May 2002, 23:51:35 -0500 (05:51 UK time) Michael L. Cusac wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

> It  looks  like  the  only way to specify non-standard headers is on
> a message-by-message  basis,  editing  by  hand.

For now, yes.

> If this was a design decision based on a philosophy of keeping
> headers to a minimum, I can respect that.

I don't know what the decision was based on, but it is a conscious
one.

<snip>

> Any chance a future version of TB! will make adding headers easier?

I've been asking for this facility since I discovered TB four years
ago! Every time, the specific header I was after gets added but no
free-form header adding facility. The last such addition was Comment:

> (If this is a question better sent to RIT, just let me know.)

> While  I'm  at  it,  is there a list of planned improvements
> available somewhere?

There's a wish-list at the BugTraq site (see below) but that doesn't
give any indication of whether or not there is any intent to implement
behind the wish.

- --
Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- List moderator
SB! v1.60d/iKey1000-5523848F0B1 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2
�
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iD8DBQE824G6OeQkq5KdzaARAiy8AKC1OKYVfvpvtMvIi5mbnxko94XgsACg8+C8
CM5Dtc2wRY1GhDhn0BPv9yU=
=gY2u
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



________________________________________________________
Current Ver: 1.60i
FAQ        : http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com

Reply via email to