Hello Csaba, On Wed, 22 May 2002 14:55:23 +0200GMT (22-5-02, 14:55 +0200GMT, where I live), you wrote:
CK> For me connection is not a problem, so IMAP could work very well here. CK> Do you know if it is planned that BAT will be developed toward IMAP in CK> the future? I'm a user, just like you. So I haven't any idea where RITlabs wants to go with TB. But the setup of TB is such that IMNSHO it doesn't make much sense to have much emphasis on IMAP. TB is about collecting mail and processing it automatically into folders, responders, etc. To do so effectively with IMAP you'd need to copy every filter to every copy of TB, otherwise their use would be fairly limited. With IMAP you need to do the processing on the server and the only thing you need a mua for is to access the processed mail and some manual operations. That is if you want to process the mail consistently. Therefor it would be a waste of resources to develop the IMAP of TB any further. The advantage to process the same mail twice (via POP3) at two locations (home and office) is that your interests at both places may differ strongly. So it would make sense to use two different sets of filters. -- Groetjes, Roelof ________________________________________________________ Current Ver: 1.60m FAQ : http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
