On Friday, June 07, 2002, Marck D Pearlstone wrote...

>> Depends... not all versions of the Klez are tacking in the
>> return-path, or should I say not all ISPs are tacking in the
>> return-path. If they were, resolving who is infected would be a hell
>> of a lot easier ;)

> Well, I get no Return-Path headers :-(.

My point exactly ;)  Some of the Klez infected emails we've been
getting here, have actually had a return-path set.  I'm not sure if
that is by the ISP, or by the virus itself.  Bit stupid if it was the
virus, and if it was the ISP, I'd like to know how, Klez is supposed
to run it's own SMTP server.

-- 
Jonathan Angliss
([EMAIL PROTECTED])



________________________________________________________
Current Ver: 1.60q
FAQ        : http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com

Reply via email to