-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi [EMAIL PROTECTED],

@11 June 2002, 21:12:16 -0500 (03:12 UK time)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

> I saw that a new HTML engine is listed as being part of the new
> version, but I just tried it and nothing seems different,

It has been re-written and now supports CSS and a lot more layout
tags.

> at least it's not doing what a typical html engine would.

That's because it's not an "engine". It's a renderer.

> Is this lack of function still intentional (I'm assuming for
> security reasons) or am I missing some setting?

It is intentional for both technical and security reasons.

> I've been waiting for ages for it to finally work so I can see
> inline images, etc.

In-line images *can* be seen. It's out-of-line images (on-line images)
that cause trouble by requiring you to connect to the internet and
download them separately to your email.

> Between ZoneAlarm and Norton A/V 2002, I'm not worried about
> anything harmful getting in.

That doesn't work, not with malicious JavaScript and HTML. Anyone can
write spy-ware and non-viral/worm code that won't upset the the
firewall and AV protection but will still run and hurt you.

> It'd be nice if we at least had the option to turn on full html,
> unless it's already there and I've missed it.

It will never be there in that form. It's just too dangerous. I
understand that support for retrieving non-sent images will be added
at some point *BUT* it will only get one image at a time and prompt
for permission for *each* image. This is because not all images *are*
images. As for whether or not the internal renderer will ever support
JScript (or VBScript) code - I doubt it.

The internal renderer will only ever be useful as a reasonable display
of the message sent. It is still going to be a case of double clicking
on the attachment to see the HTML in full gory (sic).

This is only "as it should be". HTML was designed to be used on-line.
EMail was designed to be used off-line. The crossover of the two
remains ever an uncomfortable mess of compromise, concession and risk.

- --
Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- List moderator
TB! v1.60q-5523848F0B1 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2
�
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7a-nr1 (Windows 2000)

iD8DBQE9BcgsOeQkq5KdzaARAtQsAJ4uvKELY2ywFtimAmCQzvuQ5r0kNACeM3zj
ZfIZlBnoOwkV1KG3yz5CIA4=
=T/K6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



________________________________________________________
Current Ver: 1.60q
FAQ        : http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com

Reply via email to