Hi Allie, On Wed, 12 Jun 2002 05:41:10 -0500, you wrote: > I would assume that they haven't included a source search option since > attachments consist of a lot of raw text data that would lead to a lot > of overhead if they were included in a string search.
You'd also get a lot of false positives... but I think if you were to search the whole message, you'd probably match on it because attachements are part of the body text, unless TB! stops when it hits the attachments. When I say false positives, I've found some of the spam filters I have setup on the servers are catching things in the body because of file attachments... like I have one filter in procmail that says mark the mail as spam if it contains the work "porn". Unfortunately due to the random combination of letters that are produced by attachments, occasionaly words actually crop up in there. Maybe TB! body filtering stops when it gets to attachements? -- Jonathan Angliss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) ________________________________________________________ Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ : http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
