-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jan Rifkinson [JR] wrote:
JR> Aha! I tried Panda some time ago after reading an anti-virus JR> report that gave it glowing comments & now that I think about it, JR> I had a similar situation as you describe. I don't remember what JR> TB! version I was using @ the time but since it was a Panda trial JR> I dumped it off my system. What's bugging me more is the nasty interactions often occurring and the reluctance to look in that direction as the source of the problem. We *have* to sound like a broken record since TB! in and of itself is well behaved. It will not connect beautifully and then stop after that, with the problem being cured by a system reboot or restart of TB!. If this is happening, the problem is not TB!. I had the same problem with Panda when I tested it and this is why the test period was extremely short for me. - -- -=Allie C Martin=- List Moderator | TB! v1.61 | Windows XP Pro PGP/GPG Public Key: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=2B0717E2 _________________________________________________________________ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iEYEARECAAYFAj0yLqAACgkQV8nrYCsHF+JzowCeJ7PMd6YVSXko3+5h12DxsTmr MSoAoJmI105t0xF0hGLExX7LQwp6Qdzo =FGl0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ________________________________________________________ Current Ver: 1.61 FAQ : http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
