Hello Thomas, On Thursday, July 18, 2002 at 8:57:29 AM you [TF] wrote (at least in part):
TF> asking him to send bounces to the return-path and not the From TF> address. In fact the final 'I can't deliver the mail' serv did sent it to 'Return-Path'. Have a look at the attached original messages. Look into their source. Some intermediate MTA added a second Return-Path above the original one :-(((( TF> People with no clue become postmasters and set up their systems wrong. Nevertheless true :-((((((((((((((((((((((((( "What? What the hell is a RFC? I _do_ already use NAV!" ... *without further comment* TF> Expect to see more of this. :-( ACK. And no filter in the world will catch the result of their criminal lack of knowledge :-/ I'd vote for a new X-Header in bounces: X-I-am-a-stupid-postmaster-without-knowledge-about-what-I-am-doing: Yes *Going to disemploy because it seems everybody can do my job. Not better but cheaper.* -- Regards Peter Palmreuther mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (The Bat! v1.61 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 1) If I want your opinion, I'll read your entrails. ________________________________________________________ Current Ver: 1.61 FAQ : http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
