Hi David,
On Sun, 21 Jul 2002, at 19:48:49 [GMT +0100] (19:48 where I live) you wrote:
DE> Hi Adam
DE> On 21 July 2002 at 19:12:29 +0100 (which was 19:12 where I live) Adam Rykala
DE> graced us with these comments
DE> < ... >
>> ...electronic mail sent to a large number of recipients....
DE> define [a large number of recipients]
DE> Is it 10, 100, 1000. They have put a number to it for a good reason.
Point taken. I run my own servers and I know how paranoid I am over it. Just
recently upgraded my server and yesterday it had its first smtp probe.....
Yahoo.com email adress as well.
My servers all grown up now ;-)
All goes to show just how difficult to define spam.
The famous comment relating to pornography folds....
"I cannot define spam, but I know it when I see it!"
A
--
21 July 2002, 20:07
[ Adam Rykala : [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
[ www.new-wales.net ]
[ Private key : [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
Under Worked, Over Paid... So who's complaining??
All messages both into and out of this account have been scanned with
AntiVir's Antivirus Mail Gateway for Linux. However, all attachments should be
scanned also with a virus checker at the receiver's end to ensure that the
files are clean and free of virus infection. All messages are for the
attention of the recipient only.
________________________________________________________
Current Ver: 1.61
FAQ : http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
