-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Eriks Tipans [ET] wrote:
ET> Just downloaded it (really slow and hard)! ET> Can someone confirm md5sum I've got? ET> w2ksp3.exe: FD D5 AA C3 2F 63 E6 7F 0C D2 8C 6A 1D 50 A1 E4 What's with this MD5 hash thing? Are you sure you've generated a hash to an authentic download?? It doesn't matter if it was successfully installed either. I think that comparing hash's is a ridiculous exercise in most instances. What makes simply giving the download source inadequate and providing a hash any better, *unless* the hash comes from someone official and who has signed his message with a trusted PGP key? You'll have to take this one up off-list anyway since my real intention behind this thread is that: <moderator> This thread is off-topic and has gone on long enough. Please move it off-list to TBOT or privately please. Thanks! </moderator> - -- -=Allie C Martin=- List Moderator | TB! v1.61 | Windows XP Pro PGP/GPG Public Key: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=2B0717E2 _________________________________________________________________ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.1.91 (Win32) iD8DBQE9STreV8nrYCsHF+IRAssbAJ94pYLq8OkuTci3BpWO+n7Cb72FdACfXEpB GO1lSBVO5/8ZNAphl8f0I48= =wjiZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ________________________________________________________ Current Ver: 1.61 FAQ : http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
