-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday, August 20, 2002, Jakob Breivik Grimstveit wrote...
>> On linux there is good competition in kmail but the secure version >> of the bat especially does not have any. > The question is - will RIT Labs be able to release anything under an > Open Source licence? The source would have to be freely available for it to be classed as Open Source, in which case they may as well turn the windows version Open Source too. They may be able to release binary versions under maybe the GPL license for example at which point I don't think source code needs to be distributed. I've not read the GPL license fully myself. > How 'official' is this thread anyways? I was wondering the same thing ;) - -- Jonathan Angliss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 6.5.8ckt iQA/AwUBPWJJySuD6BT4/R9zEQJ55wCgwSLRl4+rNSCv6lB80v9/Lm+WHMwAn32a qldZXoYo1Jum9qHAfxVdfGVf =RCHA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ________________________________________________________ Current version is 1.61 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
