Sh'mae The, On Fri, 30 Aug 2002, at 14:31:28 [GMT -0400] (or 19:31 in Wales) regarding 'AVG/TB limitations and issues' you wrote:
E> Thanks, Adam. I am not interested in the E> advertisement-certification feature <grin> so that was not a E> problem. I am using 1.60c -- that does concern me about the E> plug-in. I haven't upgraded because it "taint broke" and so I E> wasn't interested in "fixing it". I received a *lot* of private E> OE mail from subscribers to my mailing lists, often infected, my E> current AV and TB are fending them off nicely. I don't think I E> can trust my cable mail server for protection. Is the fact that E> I am not using 1.61 a requirement here? I wouldn't say a requirement but I certainly haven't found anything broke here when going from 1.60 to 1.61. Have a nose at the changelog to see if anything affects you! a. -- | 30 August 2002, 20:38 | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://new-wales.net | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] <- PGP Public Key Request | Debate politics with a fern. If you lose, refuse to water it. Email traffic scanned with AntiVir Mail Gateway for Linux ________________________________________________ Current version is 1.61 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
